The role of Loss Aversion Cognitive Bias and its Results in Iran's Liability System Based on The Prospect Theory

Document Type : Scientific research

Authors

• habibollah rahimi
• nasrin Khodarahmi

Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

10.22067/economlaw.2023.77469.1191

Abstract

In mainstream economics, people make decisions based on a rational model based on the cost-benefit logic. However, the behavioral attitude, as the outcome of the teachings of behavioral economics, posits that decisions are not made in the real world by real individuals about real issues as defined in the rational models of decision-making (Cost-benefit); rather, the decision-making process is influenced by biases.
One of the theories in the field of behavioral economics that deals with the effect of these biases on individuals’ decisions is the prospect theory, which focuses on the effect of loss aversion bias on the decision-making process. This study investigates the effect of loss aversion bias on the legislature’s decision-making based on the prospect theory and the teachings of behavioral economics.
The findings of this article confirm the existence of loss aversion bias-based thinking in the Iranian civil liability system, including the enacting of appropriate means of litigation, foundations of liability, and principles and rules of loss compensation. Using the prospect theory, this article seeks to find the traces of bias of loss aversion and evaluate the position of this bias in the liability system in order to provide a more realistic picture of the legislator’s decision-making.

Keywords

• Loss Aversion
• behavioral economy
• Prospect Theory
• Cognitive Bias

References

[1]. Kanhman,Daniel.Tversky,Amos. (1979). Prospect Theory:An Analysis of Decision under risk. Econometrica Society Journal, 263-292.

[2]. Shavell, Steven. (1980). Strict Liability versus Negligence, Journal of Legal Studies, PP.1-25.

[3].Shoari Nejad, Ali Akbar. (1985). Dictionary of Behavioral Sciences, first edition, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing House.

[4]. Kahneman, Daniel; Tver Samuelson, Wiilliam; Zeckhauser, Richard J. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decisiom Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7-59.

[5]. Tabatabai Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad Kazem (1990). Urwa al-Wuthqa. Beirut, Qom: Maktan-al Vokala Imam Khomeini, Esmaili Publication.

[6]. Makarem Shirzai, Nasser. (1991). The rules of jurisprudence, Volume 1. Qom: Publications of the School of Imam Amir al-Mu’minin (AS)

[7]. Tversky, Amos. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory, Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 297-323.

[8]. Seraux, A. (1992). Droit des Oligation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

 [9]. Qomi, Mirza Abolghasem (1992). Jame’ al-Shatat fi Ujubat al-Su’alat, Vol. 1, Tehran: Kayhan Publication

 [10]. Mousavi Bojnourdi, Mirza Hassan (1993). The Rules of Jurisprudence, Vol. 1. Qom: Esmailian Publication.

[11]. Tabatabai, Seyed Ali. (1994). Riyazol al-Masael, Vol. 2. Qom: Eslami Publication.

[12]. Lorassa, Michelle (1996), Civil Liability Law, (Mohammad Ashtari Trans.) Lawyers Publications

[13]. Naraqi (Fadhil), Ahmad ibn Muhammad Mahdi (1997). Awa’id al-ayyam. Qom: Islamic Propaganda Office.

[14]. Irvani, Bagher (1997). Rules of Jurisprudence, Vol. 1. Qom: Institute of Jurisprudence for Printing and Publishing.

 [15]. Maraghei, Abdol Fattah bin Ali (Mir Abdol Fattah) (1998). Al-Anawi, Vol. 1. Qom: Islamic Sciences Publishing Center.

[16]. Dawnay, Emma; Shah, Hetan;. (2005). Behavioral Economics: Seven Principles for Policy-Makers. New Economic Foundation (nef July).

 [17]. Babaei, Iraj. (2005). Critique of the Principle of the Compensability of All Damages in Iranian civil liability law. Public Law Research, 45-82.

 [18]. Lotfi, Asadullah (2006). Rules of Civil Jurisprudence. Tehran: SAMT Publications.

 [19]. Katouzian, Naser (2006). An Introduction to Law and A Study in the Iranian Legislative System. Tehran: Sherkat Sahami Enteshar Publications.

 [20]. Mohaghegh Damad, Mostafa (2007). Rules of Jurisprudence. Tehran: Islamic Sciences Publishing Center.

 [21]. Katouzian, Naser (2007). Non-contractual Obligations, Tehran: University of Tehran Press.

[22]. Crisp, R. (2008). Well-Being Standard Encyclopedia of Philosphy.

[23] Sunstein, C. Thaler, R. (2008). Nudge. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

[24]. Visscher, Louis T. (2008) Tort Damages, Rotterdam Institute of Law And Economics, Working Paper Series, N.2008/02, P.15-17.

[25]. Moshref Javadi, Mohammad Hassan (2009). Theory and Problems of Microeconomics. Isfahan: Research Center Publications.

[26]. Allama Helli, Hassan Bin Yusof (2009). Tazkareh al-Foqhaha, 1^st Ed., Qom: Al-Bayt

 [27]. Visscher, Louis T. (2009) Tort Damages, Tort Law & Economics, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 2^nd Ed. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.

[28]. Rachlinski, J. (2009). Behavioral Law and Economics,Vol.1. Cheltenham,Uk: Edvar Elgar Publishing Limited.

[29]. Rahimi, Habibollah (2009). Unjust Enrichment (A Comparative Study). Tehran: First Edition, Enteshar Co.

[30]. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking.Fast and Slow. New York: Straus and Giroux.

[31]. Arabi, Hadi (2011). A Comparative Study of Welfare and Prosperity Theories. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 61-87.

[32]. Karami, Mohammad Mehdi; Pourmand, Mohammad (2011). Jurisprudential Foundations of Islamic Economics. Qom: SAMT Publications.

 [33]. Zamir, E. (2012). Loss Aversion and The Law. Vanderbilt Law Review,vol. 65, no.3, 829-895.

[34].  Wilke A. and Mata R. (2012) Cognitive Bias. In: V.S. Ramachandran (ed.) The Encyclopedia ofHuman Behavior, vol. 1, pp. 531-535. Academic Press.   

[35]. Badini, Hassan; Momeni, Khosrow (2013). A New Approach to Proving the Validity of the No-Harm Rule Where No Rule Exists in the Field of Civil Liability, Journal of Private Law Studies, No. 3, pp. 19-32.

[36]. Khansari Najafi, Mousa bin Mohammad (2013). Minya al-Talib, Vol. 2. Najaf: Al-Mortazawiyah Publication.

[37]. Persad, Govind (2014). When, and How, Should Cognitive Bias Matter to Law, Minnesota Journal of Law and Inequality, Vol. 32, P. 31

[38]. Zamir, Eyal; Teichman, Doron;. (2014). Behavioral Economics and The Law. New York: Oxford University Press

[39]. institute of the Hozeh and university, (2014). Foundations of Islamic economics,Tehran,SAMT Publication.

[40].  Babaei, Iraj. (2015). Civil Liability Law and Non-contractual Obligations, Tehran: Mizan Publishing.

[41]. Khansari, Ahmad (2015). Iame-al Madarek (Comprehensive Documents), Vol. 5. Tehran: Maktabat-Al-Sedough.

[42]. Rahpeik, Siamak (2016). Civil Liability Rights and Compensation. Tehran: Khorsandi Publications.

[43]. Bariklo, Alireza. (2017). Civil Liability. Tehran: Mizan Publications.

[44]. Safaei, Hossein; Rahimi, Habibollah (2017). Civil Liability (Non-contractual Obligations). Tehran: The Organization for Researching and Composing University textbooks in the Humanities (SAMT) Publications.

[45]. Blanco, Fernando. (2017). Cognitive Bias. In J. Vonk, and T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior, New York. Publisher: Springer, Editors: Jennifer Vonk, tom shackelford.

[46].Zamir, Eyal; Teichman, Doron;. (2018). Behavioral Law and Economics. New York: Oxfored University Press.

[47]. Artman, Morris (2019). Behavioral Economics for Dummies (Mohsen Ranani Trans.). Avand Danesh Publication.

[48]. Ansari, Morteza. (Bita). Makaseb (No-Harm Treatise), Vol. 2. Qom: Taher Publiction.

[49]. Berthet, Vincent. (2022). The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals Decision-making: A review of four Occupational Areas, Journal of Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 12.