Study of the optimal deterrence and the gain elimination theories on punitive damages in tort cases (emphasizing on the United States Jurisprudence)

Document Type : Scientific research

Authors

• Azam Amini ¹
• Sedighe Abak ²

¹ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² University of Allameh Tabataba’i

https://doi.org/10.22067/le.v21i6.46545

Abstract

Punitive damage is a kind of Supra-compensatory damage which is awarded in favor of Plaintiff in Civil actions for punishing the defendant and deterring him from taking action like that in future. The main feature of punitive verdict is deterrence and punishment and in this regard two economic theories exist (optimal deterrence and gain elimination theories). However punitive aspect of this damage is a reason that to be considered as an identity with criminal nature and not to be applied in private actions. Lack of predictability of this damage and sometimes large and backbreaking sentences which make it more complicated, made the United States courts to come up with several strategies for limiting the punitive damages.

Keywords

• Punitive Damage
• Deterrence Theory
• Gain-elimination Theory

References

[1] Behr, Volker. (2003). Punitive Damages in America and German Law-Tendencies towards Approximation of Apparently Irreconcilable Concepts. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78: 117.

[2] Boyd, James ; Ingberman, Daniel E. (1995). Do Punitive Damages Promote Deterrence?. Business Law & Economics Center, Washington University, (08): 48.

[3] Budylin, Sergey. (2006). Punitive Damages as Social Harm Measure: Economic Analysis Continues. Oklahama City University Law Review, 31: 458-503.

[4] Calandrillo, Steve P. (2010). Penaliziing Punitive Damages: Why the Supreme Court Needs A Lesson in Law and Economics. The George Washington Law Review, 78: 791-6.

[5] Christise, George C. (1991). Current Trends in the American Law of Punitive Damages. Anglo-American Law Review, 20: 353-375.

[6] Colby, Thomas B. (2003). Beyond the Multiple Punishment Problem: Punitive Damages as Punishment for Individual, Private Wrongs. Minnesota Law Review, 87:584-8.

[7] Cooter, Robert D. (1982). Economic Analysis of Punitive Damages. Barkeley Law, 79: 83-95.

[8] Cooter, Robert D. (1989). Punitive Damages for Deterrence: When and How Much?. Alabama Law Review, 40: 1145.

[9] Cooter, Robert D.; Thames,Ulen. (2010). Law and Economics. Dadgar, Yadollah; Akhavan Hazave, Hamedeh, Economic Research of Tarbiat Modares University Press, Fourth Edition, 425-7 (In Persian).

[10] Eaton, Thomas A.; Mustard, David B.; Talarico, Susette M. (2005). The Effects of Seeking Punitive Damages on the Processing of Tort Claims. University of Georgia, Journal of Legal Studies, 34 (2): 1-5.

[11] Eisenberg, Theodore et al. (1997). The Predictability of Punitive Damages, The Journal of Legal Studies, 26: 647-9.

[12] Eisenberg, Theodore et al. (2002). Juries, Judges and Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study. Cornell Law Review, 87: 743-9.

[13] Ellis, Dorsey D. (1982). Fairness and Efficiency in the Law of Punitive Damages. Southern California Law Review, 56: 25-57.

[14] Galligan, Thomas C. (1990). Augmented Awards: The Efficient Evolution of Punitive Damages. Louisiana Law Review, 51: 692-700.

[15] Gershowitz, Adam M. (2000). Note, The Supreme Court's Backwards Proportionality Jurisprudence: Comparing Judicial Review of Excessive Criminal Punishments and Excessive Punitive Damages Awards. Virginia Law Review, 86: 1295-6.

[16] Hylton, Keith, N. (1998). Punitive Damages and the Economic Theory of Penalties. The Georgetown Law Review, 87: 1-452.

[17] Madden, M. Stuart. (2002). Renegade Conduct and Punitive Damages in Tort. South Carolina Law Review, 53: 1175.

[18] Markel, Dan. (2009). How Should Punitive Damages work?. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157: 7-139.

[19] Mattiacci, Guiseppe. (2006). The Economics of Tort Law: A Precise. Edward Elgar Publishing…

[20] Nodrati kalvanagh, Akbar. (2010). Comparative Study of Punitive Damages in Law of Iran, United States and Germany. Tehran University M.A Thesis (Gom Campus), 52-61 (In Persian).

[21] Owen, David G. (1994). A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform. Villanova Law Review, 39: 394-6.

[22] Polinsky, Mitchell ; Shavell, Steven. (1998). Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis. Harvard Law Review, 111:874-925.

[23] Reder, Margo E. K. (1996). The Current Challenges to Punitive Damages Awards. Business Law Review, 29: 74-5.

[24] Rendleman, Doug. (2010). Common Law Punitive Damages: Something for Everyone?. University of ST.Thomas Law Journal, 7: 6.

[25] Rosenberg, Ezra D. ; Wajret, Sean P. (2007). Supreme Court: Due Process Clause Prohibits Punitive Damages Based on Harm to Non-parties. Dechert's Mass Torts and Product Liability Group, 30:1.

[26] Schkade, David ; Sunstein, Cass R. ; Kahneman, Daniel. (1999). Do People Want Optimal Deterrence?. John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper, (77): 7.

[27] Sebok, Anthony J. (2007). Punitive Damages: From Myth to Theory. Iowa Law Review, 92: 983-9.

[28] Sharkey, Catherine M. (2003). Punitive Damages As Societal Damages. The Yale Law Journal, 113: 351-375.

[29] Sharkey, Catherine M. (2012). Economic Analysis of Punitive Damages: Theory, Empirics, and Doctrine. NYU Law and Economics Research Paper, (12): 51-5.

[30] Wieber Lens, Jil. (2011). Punishing for the Injury: Tort Law's Influence on the Constitutional Limitations of Punitive Damage Awards. Hofstra Law Review, 39 (595): 31-48.

[31] Weinrib, Ernest J. (2003). Punishment and Disgorgement As Contract Remedies. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78: 86.