Theoretically there are two views concerning how to deal with international insolvency. The first and the international view asserts the court of each country is merely responsible for the property of the debtor which is within its domain. In contrast, the idealistic world-wide contends that the only solution to the plight of international financial is to have a court deal with the issue with the rule of one law. These two views have merged and culminated in “Cooperative territoriality” that seems to meet our needs. Finally we can say all attempts in this direction have been initiated by scholars in developed countries and theoretical arguments and practical measures can serve their interest to a greater extent.
Mohammadi,S and Kadivar,H . (2013). Vagueness in International Insolvency; In Search of Proper Theory. (e28151). Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal, 20(3), e28151 doi: 10.22067/le.v20i3.34287
MLA
Mohammadi,S , and Kadivar,H . "Vagueness in International Insolvency; In Search of Proper Theory" .e28151 , Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal, 20, 3, 2013, e28151. doi: 10.22067/le.v20i3.34287
HARVARD
Mohammadi S, Kadivar H. (2013). 'Vagueness in International Insolvency; In Search of Proper Theory', Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal, 20(3), e28151. doi: 10.22067/le.v20i3.34287
CHICAGO
S Mohammadi and H Kadivar, "Vagueness in International Insolvency; In Search of Proper Theory," Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal, 20 3 (2013): e28151, doi: 10.22067/le.v20i3.34287
VANCOUVER
Mohammadi S, Kadivar H. Vagueness in International Insolvency; In Search of Proper Theory. Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal. 2013;20(3):e28151 (In Persian). doi: 10.22067/le.v20i3.34287