The legal and economic effects of Interference Elimination Commission of the code of the Elimination of Barriers to Competitive Production and the Upgrading of the Country's Financial System and related Regulations

Document Type : Scientific research

Authors

• Abolfazl Dankob
• Mohammad Gholam Ali Zadeh
• Hamid Reza Ismaili
• Ghulam Abbas Nazarkhani

https://doi.org/10.22067/lowecon.2022.41777

Abstract

    According to Article 54 of the code of the Elimination of Barriers to Competitive Production and the Upgrading of the Country's Financial System and related Regulations, a commission called the "Interference Elimination Commission" is responsible for eliminating interference from the implementation of parallel acts in the field of lands that recently, in the line with the growth and development  of the economy and elimination the overlap of laws and amendment of documents, especially property ones, has been foreseen by the legislator. According to the mentioned act, the relevant organizations will be obliged, in addition to resolving the conflicts and disputes that have arisen between the government and individuals in this area, and establishing land ownership of natural and legal persons under public and private law, also consider how to receive the cost and price of the lands from which the interference has been eliminated. Thus, by consolidating the type and so the ownership, while eliminating the judiciary and reducing the related lawsuits, legal obstacles will be provided on the way to high production and a suitable platform for economic growth and development.
      In addition, according to the function of the above-mentioned act, it is well understood that, the legislator has basically intended to motivate manufacturing companies on the way of the growth and domestic production by creating incentives for private ownership, and through this way by improving productive employment, helps to improve social welfare. Accordingly, the costs of disputes over land ownership will be reduced or minimized, which in order to achieve, should not neglect the fundamental role of efficient land management and the establishment of ownership as one of the basic foundations of production.
         In the opinion of the author, the correct implementation of such an act, in addition to stabilizing the ownership of people and reducing the costs of disputes over ownership, can be used as an effective tool in terms of production growth and economic prosperity.  However, now, due to the lack of information about the decisions of parallel commissions and the lack of aggregated software records, as well as the weaknesses in relation to the decisions of the commission, including: uncertainty of the decision and its administrative nature and how to act based on traditional executive mechanisms, there is a considerable amount of doubt in achieving these goals.
 
 
 

Keywords

• Uncultivated Land
• State Ownership
• Interferences
• National Lands
• Private Ownership

References

 

 

Ali akbar, D. k. (1963). Dictionary. Esfhan: ghaemieh Research Center (in persian)

arazi, M. o. (2018). This executive letter is an additional note to Article 9 of the Lawon increasing the Productivity of the Agricultural Sector. Zanjan: Information base of cadastre proects and elimination of interferences in Zanjan province (in persian)

Collection, N. R. (2000). Legal and Inspection Office of the countrys forrests and pastures, Forest and Rangeland and Watershed Organization press. Natural Resource Law Collection (in persian)

Dadgar, I. (2010). Basic Components and dimensions of law and economics. Tehran: Pajoheshkade eghtesad (in persian)

Daneshvar, H., & Chavoshi, M. s. (2015). the status of lands, subject to land regulations and reforms in the Iranian legal system. Tehran: Dadgostar (in persian)

Dr Emami khooiy, M. t., & Ziaiy, N. (2008). Land reform and its effects on the agricultural community of Iran. Maskooie, 12 (in persian)

Eftekhari, M., & Vaziri hamane, M. (2019). Determining the assignment of lands subject to Article 56 of the Law on Forests and Rangelands. InternatiTourism of Iranonal Congress of Developing Agriculturee,Natural Resources, Environment and (p. 6). Tabriz: Oloom Jahan Eslam (in persian)

Ghasemi hamed, A. (2014). Economic law. Legal research, 48 (in persian)

Hoshiar, S. (1979). Law on Abolitition of Ownership of Urban Dead Land its Civil Quality. Tehran: Ghanoon (in persian)

Kamalan, S. m. (2011). Urban land law. Tehran: Kamalan (in persian)

Khajavi, A., & Ghanavati, J. (2018). A theoretical and practical study of the role of stabilizing government ownership in preventing land grabbing. Detective, 32 (in persian)

Lotfi, h., & Gholami, I. (2018). Legal analysis of the elements of litigation objecting to the recognition of national lands. Justice, 157 (in persian)

Majles. (1335). Law on Government Land,Municipalites, Endowments and Banks. Tehran: Samane meli Ghavanin va moghararat (in persian)

Montazeri, M. e. (2016). Procedures in litigation against land nationalization . Quarterly Journal of Private and Criminal Law Research, 110,111 (in persian)

Nik azm, M. (2021). Legal review of Article 12 of the Urban Land Law Commission. Electronic Legal Research Lawyer Yar, 56 (in persian)

Oorseji, S. (2019). Legal study of pure, new and coastal lands in the Iranian registry system. Opportunities and challenges facing the Caspian sea (p. 8). Gorgan: Opportunities and challenges facing the Caspian sea (in persian)

Pakdel janiar, M., & Maleki, M. (2019). Investingating the extent of interference between natural resources laws and land reform in the presevation and transfer of national lands in the conventional media of Bilesvar city - Adabil provice. Marta, 424,425 (in persian)

Rapeik, H., & Rostami, H. r. (2018). Restriction of private property by the government for private use. Excellence in Rights, 147,148 (in persian)

Rezaiy, R. (2013). Urban Land Law approved in 1981. Tehran: Shenasname hooghoogh (in persian)

Samadi, A. h. (2008). The place of prpperty rights in economic ideas and schools with emphoasis on the views of new institutionalists. Right, 233, 234 (in persian)

Shams, D. A. (2003). Civil code of procedure. Tehran: Mizan (in persian)

Sharifzadeh, M. j., & Naderan, E. (2009). Economic analysis of property rights in Islamic with emphasis on the concept of transaction costs. Islamic economy, 22 (in persian)