The approach of legal systems toward Unsolicited Commercial Message (SPAM)

Document Type : Scientific research

Authors

• Mostafa Bakhtiarvand ¹
• sayyed mohammad hadi Ghabooli Dorafshan ²

¹ 1- Associate Professor, Department of Private Law and Intellectual Property Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

² Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Jurisprudence and Principles of Islamic Law, Ferdowsi University

10.22067/economlaw.2024.85568.1331

Abstract

Unsolicited commercial messages (spam) are sent electronically and in bulk, without the consent of the recipient, through tools such as e-mail or SMS. Apart from the advantages for advertisers, spam can violate the privacy of internet and mobile phone users and cause economic losses and widespread dissatisfaction of consumers and even merchants. This, along with the possibility of disrupting the functioning of systems such as e-mail and SMS, may lead to mistrust of e-commerce and digital economy.
The results of this descriptive-analytical article show that some countries allow the sending of spam even without the consent of the recipient, and their subsequent opposition is considered an obstacle to sending, which is called the opt-out method. Other countries require the prior consent of the recipient that it is known as the opt-in method. The two mentioned methods are applied through three legislative approaches namely with tolerance, intermediate and hard, which are divided and named according to the way of dealing with spam senders and remedies and sanctions. The position of Iranian law regarding the prohibition or permission of sending spam is not very clear. In this article, passing a law or some explicit and transparent legal articles regarding spam, by adopting an opt-in method and predicting efficient remedies and sanctions in Iran, is proposed.

Keywords

• Spam
• Commercial Advertisements
• Unsolicited Commercial Message
• Opt-in Approach
• Opt-out Approach

References

• APT (2022), Collaborative Response Measures to Prevent Unsolicited Commercial Messages (Spam) in the Asia Pacific Region, available at:  https://www.apt.int/sites/default/files/2023/05/20220220-Collaborative_Response_Measures_to_Prevent_Unsolicited_Commercial_Messages_in_Asia_Pacific_Regionfinal-clean.pdf. (last visited: 12/15/2023).
• Arunkrishna, M, Mukunthan, B (2020), Evolutionary Traits In Digital Spam: History ,Types, Techniques and Anti Spam Solutions, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, v.29, n.3s, pp. 825-834.
• Asscher, L. F. (2004), Regulating Spam: Directive 2002/58 and Beyond, available at: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=607183. (last visited: 12/13/2023).
• Australian Spam Act of 2003.
• Bambauer, D. et al. (2005), A Comparative Analysis of Spam Laws: The Quest for a Model Law, ITU.
• Bender, M. R. (2006), Australia’s Spam Legislation: A Modern-Day King Canute?, Working Paper No. 2, Monash University.
• Boyne, Sh. M. (2018), Data Protection in the United States, Oxford University Press.
• Commission of the European Communities (2004), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on unsolicited commercial communications or 'spam', available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52004DC0028. (last visited: 11/10/2023).
• CompuServe Incorporated v. Cyber Promotions, Inc. and Sanford Wallace 962 F. Supp. 1015, Case No. C2-96-1070 (S.D. Ohio, Feb. 3, 1997).
• Congressional Research Service (2008), “Spam”: An Overview of Issues Concerning Commercial Electronic Mail, available at: https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20080514_RL31953_f6f8e72738bad07a686e2e488581e7b381875096.pdf (last visited: 12/15/2023 ).

 

• DEED (2023), A Legal Guide To Privacy and Data Security, available at: https://mn.gov/deed/assets/a-legal-guide-to-privacy-and-data-security-2023_ACC_tcm1045-560279.pdf. (last visited: 12/10/2023).
• Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (E-Privacy Directive).
• DIRECTIVE 2009/136/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 November 2009.
• Dong, X. S., Jayakar, K. (2013), Can We Can Spam? A Comparison of National Spam Regulations, Telecommunications Policy Research Conference 2013.
• FCC (2023), Targeting and Eliminating Unlawful Text Messages, available at: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-391239A1.pdf . (last visited: 12/15/2023).
• Ferrara, E. (2019), The History of Digital Spam, Communications of the ACM, v.62,n.8,pp.82-91.
• Figliola, P. M. (2007), “Spam”: An Overview of Issues Concerning Commercial Electronic Mail, Congressional Research Service.
• Figliola, P. M. (2008), Text and Multimedia Messaging: Emerging Issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service.
• FRA (2018), Handbook on European Data Protection Law, FRA.
• Hedley, S. (2006), A Brief History of Spam, Information & Communications Technology Law, v.15,n.3,pp. 223-238.
• https://195.cra.ir/. (last visited: 11/11/2023).
• https://focus.namirial.global/gdpr-privacy-spam-emails/. (last visited: 10/17/2023).
• https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=LG_Heidelberg_-_4_S_1/21 (last visited: 11/14/2023).
• https://mci.ir/not-receiving-promotional-sms. (last visited:11/14/2023).
• https://sentenze.laleggepertutti.it/sentenza/cassazione-civile-n-3311-del-08-02-2017 . (last visited: 11/13/2023).
• https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2015/08/candid-answers-can-spam-questions. (last visited:11/15/2023).
• https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business. (last visited: 10/10/2023).
• https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commercial_speech. (last visited:11/10/2023).
• https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexis-practice-advisor/thejournal/b/lpa/archive/2016/11/08/complying-with-the-can-spam-act.aspx. (last visited: 10/12/2023).
• https://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/26/business/gates-predicts-that-spam-will-go-away.html. (last visited: 11/14/2023).
• https://www.statista.com/statistics/1270488/spam-emails-sent-daily-by-country/. (last visited: 12/15/2023).
• Internet Society (2012), Combating Spam: Policy, Technical and Industry Approaches, available at: https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2012/combating-spam-policy-technical-and-industry-approaches/. (last visited: 11/10/2023).
• Iranian Electronic Commerce Act of 2002.
• Ju, J. et al. (2021),Can It Clean Up Your Inbox? Evidence from South Korean Anti-spam Legislation, Production and Operations Management Society, v.0,n.0, pp.1-17.
• Juneja, P. G., Pateriya, R.K. (2014), A Survey on Email Spam Types and Spam Filtering Techniques, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), v.3, issue 3, pp.2309-2314.
• Korean Act on the Promotion of Information and Communications, Network Utilization and Data Protection of 1999.

 

• LG Heidelberg - 4 S 1/21.
• Loi n° 2004-575 du 21 juin 2004 pour la confiance dans l'économie numérique.
• Manwaring, K. (2009), Canning the Spam Five Years on: a Comparison of Spam Regulation in Australia and the US, Computers & Law November 2009, pp.5-11.
• Mathews, K. J. (2004), Understanding & Complying with the “CAN-SPAM” ACT, Washington Legal Foundation.
• Milliet, M. (n.d), The regulation of spam A theoretical and practical analysis, available at: https://www.e2m.lu/sites/default/files/files/spam.pdf. (last visited: 12/15/2023).
• Moore, Roy L, May, Carmen, Collins, Eric L (2011), Advertising and Public Relations Law, Routledge.
• Mosing, M. W. (2014), Spamming in the EU Solutions for Unsolicited Electronic Mail Ahead ?, available at: https://www.it-law.at/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/mosing-spam-eu.pdf. (last visited: 12/10/2023).
• Moustakas, E. et al (2005), Combating Spam through Legislation: A Comparative Analysis of US and European Approaches, International Conference on Email and Anti-Spam.
• NG, K. (2005),Spam Legislation in Canada : Federalism, Freedom of Expression and the Regulation of the Internet, University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal, v. 2, n. 2, pp. 447-491.
• Pakzad, B., Azadikhah, M.H. (2016), The Foundations of Criminalization of Sending Unsolicited Electronic Messages, Penal Law and Criminology Studies, v.3, n.2, pp.195-217. (In Persian).
• Papakonstantinou, V. (2011), The Amended EU Law on ePrivacy and Electronic Communications. New Rules on Data Protection, Spam, Data Breaches and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights, J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. v.29, issue 1, pp. 29-74.
• Parker, Y. M. (2006), Unsolicited Commercial E-mail, Privacy Concerns Related To Social Network Services, Online Protection of Children, and Cyberbullying, Journal of Innovations in Digital Marketing, v.3,n.1, pp. 1-11.
• Practical Law (2023), Direct Marketing in the US: Overview, available at: https://www.privacyworld.blog/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2023/07/Direct-Marketing-in-the-US-Overview-5-500-4203.pdf. (last visited: 11/7/2023).
• Prasetia, A. R., Istambul, R. (2021), The Problems of Sending Spam E-Mails To People In Indonesia, Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, v.12, n.8, pp.681-686.
• REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural

 

• persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
• Revar, P. et al (2017), A Review on Different types of Spam Filtering Techniques, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, v.8 n.9, pp. 2720-2723.
• Reyero, J. (2017), The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: A False Hope, SMU Science and Technology Law Review, v. XI, pp. 195-226.
• Serna, F. J. A. (2022), The Legal Regulation of Spam: An International Comparative Study, Journal of Innovations in Digital Marketing, v.3,n.1, pp.1-11.
• Smith, M. S. (2004), “Spam”: An Overview of Issues Concerning Commercial Electronic Mail, Congressional Research Service.
• The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography And Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act of 2003 (CAN-SPAM Act).