1. Adinolfi, G. (2021). Soft Law in International Investment Law and Arbitration. The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law, 1(1),
86–112.
2. Atanasova, D.; Beyer, V. and Ostransky, J. (2024). Compensation and Damages in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Option for Reform,
ICSID Report.
3. Azizi, S. and Mousavi, S.M. (2017). Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project Case: The Role of the International Court of Justice in Highlighting the
Concept of Sustainable Development, International Law Review, 33(55), 109-134. (in Persian)
4. Baghban, R. (2024). International Trade Law, Responsibility of Multinational Enterprise (2nd ed.). Tehran: Majd Publication. (i n Persian)
5. Balcerzak, F. (2024) The Role of Customary International Law in International Investment Law Remedies, In P. Merkouris, A. Kulick, J. M.
Álvarez-Zarate, & M. Żenkiewicz (Eds.), Custom and its Interpretation in International Investment Law (pp. 284–306). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
6. Banafi, F. and Arashpour, A. (2018). The Stance of Precautionary Principle in the Protection of Marine Environment, Journal of Legal Studies,
9(4), 31-58. (in Persian)
7. Birnie, P., Boyle, A., & Redgwell, C. (2009). International law and the environment (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Blake, J.E. and Rezaipour F. (2020). An Examination of the Impact of Precautionary Principle in Cross-Sectoral Trade-Environment Dispute
Settlement on the Unity of International Law, Public Law Studies Quarterly, 9(3), 1003-1023. (in Persian)
9. Brundtland Commission. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. United Nations.
10. Buckley, P. (2004). FDI and Growth for Developing Countries: MNEs and the Challenges of the “New” Economy. in The Role of Industrial
Development in the Achievement of the Millennium Development Goals; Proceedings of the Industrial Development Forum and Associated
Round Tables, 1st ed., Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), pp. 325-338.
11. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.
12. Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), & ClientEarth. (2023). Investor-
State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Mechanisms and the Right to a Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable Environment, Joint submission to the
Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment. https://www.iisd.org/publications/brief/iisd-ciel-clientearth-isds-sustainable-
enivronment-submission-2023
13. Craig, P. and De Búrca, G. (2015). EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford University Press.
14. de Sadeleer, N. (2020). The Principles of Prevention and Precaution in International Law: Two Heads of the Same Coin? In T. Kuokkanen, O.
Mejía-Lemos, & E. Tedschi (Eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (2nd ed., pp. 151–170). Edward Elgar.
15. Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Duvic-Paoli L.A. (2018). The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press.
17. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2),
130–141.
18. Ebrahimgol, A., & Nikbin, M. (2023). The Role and Function of General Principles of Law in International Investment Law. Public Law Studies
Quarterly, 53(2), 619–639. (in Persian)
19. Ezeudu, M-J. (2024). Reflections on the Corporate Social Responsibility Landscape for Canadian Mining Transnational Corporations in the
Aftermath of Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 42(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2
023.2232237
20. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
21. Goklany, I.M. (2001). The Precautionary Principle: A Critical Appraisal of Environmental Risk Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.
22. Hart, O. (2007). Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Kadkhodaei, A. and Salari, A. (2018). Precautionary in International Law: A Customary Principle or a General Principle of Law?, Public Law
Research, 20(59), 33-63. (in Persian)
24. Mallya, M. (2024). Bilateral Investment Treaties, Investor Obligations and Customary International Environmental Law. In P. Merkouris, A.
Kulick, J. M. Álvarez-Zarate, & M. Żenkiewicz (Eds.), Custom and its Interpretation in International Investment Law (pp. 251–274). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
25. Marr, S. (2003). The Precautionary Principle in the Law of the Sea. Ecologic Institute.
26. Masumy, N. & Hourani, S. (2024). The Invocation of the Precautionary Principle within the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism:
Not Seizing the Occasion, Laws, 13(22), 1-19.
27. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(3),
173–185.
28. Mofidian, Sh. (2022). Compliance of the Iranian Oil Industry 2019-Social Responsibility Code with the Jurisprudence and Conventional System
of Multinational Companies, Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 9(3), 287-320. (in Persian)
29. Mohebi, M. (2006). International Arbitration Precedents, of the Question of Compensation, in Oil Disputes, International Law Review, 23(35),
9-70. (in Persian)
30. Muchlinski, P. (2007). Multinational Enterprises and the Law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Pogge, T. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32. Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility.
Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
33. Rajabi, E.; KazemiAzar, Sh. And Farzanegan, M. (2024). A comparative study of Iran legal order in facing the guiding principles of business and
human rights (John Ruggie Principles) approved in 2011, Comparative Law Quarterly, 8(2), 93-111. (in Persian)
34. Ramazani Ghavam Abadi, M.H. (2013). A Comparative Study of ‘Precautionary Principle’ in Opinions and Decisions of International Tribunals,
Public Law Research, 15(40), 141-164. (in Persian)
35. Resnik, D.B. (2021). Precautionary Reasoning in Environmental and Public Health Policy, Switzerland: Springer.
36. Rodríguez, T.R. (2022). Investment Treaty Law and Climate Change, Switzerland: Springer.
37. Sabahi, B. (2011). Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Sands, P. (2003). Principles of International Environmental Law (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Savrai, P. and Fazeli, M. (2020) The Role of International Investment Arbitration in Interpretation of Precautionary Principle in Oil Disputes,
Legal Research Quarterly, 23(89), 243-271. (in Persian)
40. Scherer, A.G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian
Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
41. Schill, S. W. (2017). Sources of International Investment Law: Multilateralization, Arbitral Precedent, Comparativism, Soft Law. in The Oxford
Handbook of the Sources of International Law, (pp. 1095-1116), Besson, S. and D’Aspremont, J. (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Sohn, L.B., & Baxter, R.R. (1961). Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens. American Journal of
International Law, 55(3), 545–584.
43. Sundararajan, A. (2017). Environmental Counterclaims: Enforcing International Environmental Law through Investor-State Arbitration. Salzburg
Global Seminar.
44. Tomoko, I. (2015). The Role of the Precautionary and Polluter Pays Principles in Assessing Compensation. RIETI Discussion Paper Series,
15-E-107.
45. Verschuuren, J. (2019). The Principle of Sustainable Development as a Legal Norm. In Research handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental
Law (pp. 227–231). Edward Elgar Publishing.
46. Viñuales, J. E. (2014). Customary law in investment regulation. Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, 23(1), 23–46.
47. Waelde, T., & Kolo, A. (2001). Environmental regulation, investment protection and “regulatory taking” in international law. The International
and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50(4), 811–848.
48. Wiener, J.B. and Rogers, M.D. (2002). Comparing Precaution in the United States and Europe, Journal of Risk Research, 5(4), 317-349.
49. Yaghoobirad, P. (Translator) (2021). Human Rights and Multinational Corporations: The United-Nations Policies Companies’ Responsibilities
to Protect Human Rights in Business, François Ouzelet, Journal of Legal Research, 20(46), 347-369. (in Persian)
Documents and Conventions
50. African Union Commission. (2016). Draft Pan African Investment Code. Addis Ababa: African Union.
51. Council of Europe. (1952). European Convention on Human Rights, Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
52. International Labour Organization. (2014). ILO Core Conventions and Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Geneva: ILO.
53. International Law Commission. (2001). Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Yearbook of the International
Law Commission, 2001, vol. II, Part Two.
54. Morocco–Nigeria Reciprocal Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement. (2016). Signed 3 December 2016.
55. OECD. (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Paris: OECD Publishing.
56. Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group (OEIGWG). (2021). Third revised draft of a legally binding instrument to regulate, in international
human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises.
57. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. (1992). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio
de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992, UN Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I).
58. United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. (2003). Norms on the responsibilities of transnational
corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2.
59. United Nations. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy”
Framework. Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
60. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN General Assembly Resolution A/
RES/70/1. Retrieved from
61. United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). (2020). Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States,
and Canada, entered into force 1 July 2020.
62. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
