International Standards of Foreign Investment Protection

Document Type : Scientific research

Authors

• Alireza Ansari Mahyari ¹
• Leila Raisi ²

¹ Ph.D. Candidate of Public International Law, Department of Law ,Isfahan (khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

² Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch

https://doi.org/10.22067/le.v25i13.64645

Abstract

1. Introduction
Today, one of the important economic issues that has a significant role in the economic growth and development of countries, especially in developing countries, is foreign investment. Therefore, these countries compete to attract more foreign investment.
One of the major obstacles to foreign investment is the lack of security in the host state; this lack of security is due to dangers such as war, turbulence and regime change that threaten investors. Therefore, the formulation of regulations on the protection of foreign investors at the national and international levels can cause to reduce the sense of danger and be a source of confidence among investors. Protecting foreign investment today is one of the important issues of international investment law that can help countries and investors to remove investment barriers and attract more capital.
Since the 1960s, countries have created an extensive collection of bilateral treaties in order to protect foreign investors. It was known as bilateral treaties for promotion and protection of investment. In fact, the main purpose of concluding these treaties was that, as a supplement to the domestic laws and regulations of investment, they can provide an international mechanism to support as much as possible foreign investment and regulate related affairs, as well as a favorable environment for host governments to attract foreign investment. In these treaties, a set of standards is anticipated to support foreign investors and create a secure environment that has had a significant impact on the growth and development of foreign investment. Some of these standards include fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security, national treatment and most-favored-nations treatment.
2. Methodology
This study with analysis of international arbitral tribunals and state practices in bilateral and multilateral treaties discusses the development of standards of fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security, national treatment and most-favored-nations treatment. The research method used in this study is descriptive-analytical using library resources.
3. Results and Discussion
The fair and equitable treatment standard establishes one of the most important elements available to a foreign investor to protect his investment in a foreign country, because it provides him with a certain treatment that the host state must grant regardless of the treatment given to its own nationals. Full protection and security standard can be a complement to fair and equitable treatment and according to it, the host state is committed to adopt some measures to protect foreign investors against unfavorable events and harmful acts.
National treatment is considered as one of the important standards in international investment law to ensure optimal performance of the host state with foreign investments so that the host state in the same way which treats domestic investors also deal with foreign investors. The most-favored-nation treatment standard can be a complement to national treatment. According to this standard, host state must treat third state investors as it treats foreign investors because this standard is used to prevent discrimination against foreign investment.
These standards are a treaty-based obligation that must be put into a specific treaty and are not a requirement of customary international law. So, if these standards are not stipulated in the treaty, the host state will have no obligation to comply with these standards against the foreign investor.
One of the important issues of international standards of foreign investment protection is identification of concepts, examples and their application; but, in this study, in addition to the above, the main goal is to examine whether these standards of protection have been developed since the emergence, so far, or it is still used in the present era traditionally? The hypothesis of the authors is that the standards of foreign investment protection, like many other international issues, have had many fluctuations since the emergence and due to the dynamics and development of international investment law, they have also undergone many changes; therefore, today we can speak of significant progress and development in this area.
4. Conclusion
In this study, by describing and analyzing concepts and examples and methods of enforcement of foreign investment protection standards in bilateral and multilateral investment treaties which these standards have been used in most of them and as well as the examination of international arbitration tribunals procedure that have issued various decisions regarding these standards, it is concluded that there are no specific examples for the application of investment protection standards in the investment treaties and international arbitration tribunals procedure.This implies the breadth, flexibility and dynamism of the aforementioned protective standards. Therefore, the growth and development of investment treaties and international arbitration procedure has caused the development of these standards over time. This development has had a positive role in attracting and growing foreign investment in host countries.
Accordingly, today, these standards can be used as a system of foreign investment protection that is not static and is in progress. Consequently, the present study emphasizes this hypothesis that the standards of foreign investment protection have exited from the traditional conditions over time and they are used according to the requirements of the time and circumstances of each particular case.

Keywords

• foreign investment
• fair and equitable treatment
• full protection and security
• national treatment
• most-favoured-nations treatment

References

[1] Aisbett, Emma, Karp, Larry and McAusland, Carol. (2010). "Compensation for Indirect Expropriation in International Investment Agreements: Implications of National Treatment and Rights to Invest," Journal of Globalization and Development, Vol. 1: Iss. 2. Available at: https://are.berkeley.edu/~karp/JrGlob&Dev.pdf

[2] Alidousti Shahraki, Naser. (2015). Foreign investment law, Tehran; Kjorsandi. (In Persian)

[3] Angelet , N.. (2011). "Fair and Equitable Treatment", Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law[MPEPIL]. Available at:

[4] http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law9780199231690-e2055?prd=EPIL

[5] Askari, pouria. (2015). The Law of Foreign Investment in International Arbitration Practice, Tehran; ShahreDanesh. (In Persian)

[6] Bjorklund, Andrea K. (2008). "National Treatment", in August Reinisch, ed., Standards of Investment Protection, oxford, Oxford University Press.

[7] Bronfman, M.K. (2006). “Fair and Equitable Treatment – An Evolving Standard”, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 10. Available at: http://www.mpil.de/files/pdf3/mpunyb_15_marcela_iii.pdf

[8] Collins, David. (2011). "Applying the Full Protection and Security Standard of International Investment Law to Digital Assets", Journal of World Investment and Trade, vol. 12, issue. 2. Available at: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/627/2/ApplyingtheFullProtectionandSecurityStandard.pdf

[9] Collins, David. (2014). "national treatment in emerging market investment treaties", in Anselm Kamperman Sanders, ed., The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law: Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar publishing.

[10] Cordero Moss, Giuditta. (2008). "Full Protection and Security" in August Reinisch, ed., Standards of Investment Protection, Oxford.

[11] De Brabandere, Eric. (2016). " States’ Reassertion of Control Over International Investment Law - (Re)Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment and Indirect Expropriation" in Andreas Kulick, ed., Reassertion of Control Over the Investment Treaty Regime, Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2846998

[12] Demirkol, Berk. (2015). "The Notion of 'Investment' in. International Investment Law", the Turkish Commercial Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 1. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2579247

[13] Dolzer, Rudolf , Schreuer, Christoph. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law, New York : Oxford University Press.

[14] Dolzer, Rudolf. (2014). "Fair and Equitable Treatment: Today's Contours", Santa Clara Journal of international law, vol.12. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol12/iss1/2/

[15] Dumberry, Patrick. (2016-A). " Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Become a Rule of Customary International Law?", Journal of International Dispute Settlement, first published online. Available at: http://jids.oxfordjournals.org.sci-hub.cc/content/early/2016/04/01/jnlids.idw002.full.pdf

[16] Dumberry, Patrick. (2016-B). "The Practice of States as Evidence of Custom: An Analysis of Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Clauses in States’ Foreign Investment Laws", McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution, Vol. 2, No. 1. Available at: http://mjdr-rrdm.ca/law/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/6.-Dumberry-.pdf

[17] Ebrahimi, Seyed Nasrollah and Soltanzadeh, Sajad. (2015). "The Concept of Investment in Arbitration Precedent of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)", International Law Review, Winter and Spring, Volume 31, Issue 50. (In Persian)

[18] Gaillard, E.. (2009)."Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice", in Christina Binder, Ursula Kriebaum, August Reinisch, Stephan Wittich, ed., International Investment Law For the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, New York, Oxford University Press.

[19] Gehne, Katja & Brillo, Romulo. (2017). "Stabilization Clauses in International. Investment Law: Beyond Balancing and. Fair and Equitable Treatment", Institute of Economic Law, Transnational Economic Law Research Center (TELC). School of Law.

[20] Available at: http://telc.jura.uni-halle.de/sites/default/files/BeitraegeTWR/Heft%20143.pdf

[21] Grabowski, Alex. (2014). "The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Defense of Salini," Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 15: No. 1. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol15/iss1/13

[22] Grierson-Weiler, T. and Laird, I. (2008) ‘Standards of Treatment’ in The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, edited by Muchlinski, Peter, Federico Ortino, and Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[23] Haddadi,Mahdi. (2000). "Developments in the governing law on treat with foreign investment", Journal of Mojtamae AAlie Ghome, Summer, Issue 6. (In Persian)

[24] Harb, Jean-Pierre. (2011). "Definition of investments protected by international treaties: an on-going hot debate", Mealey's International Arbitration Report, Vol. 26: No. 8. Available at: http://www.jonesday.com/files/Publication/c24e6d62-3269-4b32-b93d-992f1d5e2e77/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/b4526438-d73b-4bd4-a780-8003fe19feaf/689472.pdf

[25] Hasibi, Behazin. (2011). Government and Foreign Investors: International Standards, Tehran; shahreDanesh. (In Persian)

[26] Kazemi, Sayeh and Bromand, Hamed. (2016). Effective Strategies for Ensuring Investments in the Host State, Tehran; Avabook. (In Persian)

[27] Kläger, Roland. (2011). Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[28] Kurtz, Jürgen. (2010). "The Merits and Limits of Comparativism: National Treatment in International Investment Law and the WTO", in Stephan W. Schill, ed., International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford University press.

[29] Lowe, Vaughan. (2007)." Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law ", Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 4. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=970727

[30] Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas J., Mavroidis Petros C., and Hahn, Michael. (2015). The World Trade Organization. Law, Practice, and Policy, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

[31] Mirvaisi, Alireza. (2014). Foreign Investment Law in the Light of Bilateral Investment Treaties, Tehran; Paris publication. (In Persian)

[32] Mohsenpour,Samira. (2016). Foreign Investment and Environment Protection in International Law, Tehran; Majd. (In Persian)

[33] Mojtehedi, Mohammadreza. (2011). "Introduction to the International Settlement Disputes Law on the basis of the ICSID Arbitration Convention", Feghh and Islamic law, autumn and winter, Issue 3. (In Persian)

[34] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). International Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and Tracking Innovations, OECD publishin.

[35] Available at: www.oecd.org/daf/inv/internationalinvestmentagreements/40471468.pdf

[36] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Most Favored Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2004_2.pdf

[37] Piran, Hossein. (2014). The Law of International Investment, Tehran; Ganje Danesh. (In Persian)

[38] Pouresmaeili, Alireza. (2017). Trade Related Investment Measures in the World Trade Organization, Tehran; mizan legal foundation. (In Persian)

[39] Salacuse, Jeswald W.. (2015). The Law of Investment Treaties, 2nd edition, Oxford International Law Library.

[40] Schill, S W. (2010). ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law, and Comparative Public Law’ in S W Schill (ed). International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law.

[41] Schreuer, Christoph. (2010)." Full Protection and Security", Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 1, No. 2.

[42] Schreuer, Christoph. (2013) ," investment,international protection" , Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL]. Available at: http://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/wordpress/pdf/investments_Int_Protection.pdf

[43] Shamsayi, Mohammad. (2017). "Stabilization Clauses in State Contracts", spring, Issue 18. (In Persian)

[44] Sornarajah, M., (2010). The international law on foreign investment,3rd edition, United kingdom, Cambridge university press.

[45] Thulasidhass, P. R., (2015). "Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law: Ascertaining the Limits Through Interpretative Principles", Amsterdam Law Forum, Volume 7(1).Available at: http://amsterdamlawforum.org/article/view/346/512

[46] Titi, Catharine. (2016). "Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment: Survival Clauses and Reform of International Investment Law", Journal of International Arbitration 33, no. 5. Available at: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.sci-hub.cc/document.php?id=JOIA2016034

[47] Tudor, Ioana. (2008). "The FET in International Investment Agreements: A Typology of Drafting Formulations", in Ioana Tudor, ed., The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Foreign Investment Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

[48] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2011). Scope and Definition, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International investment agreements II, New York and Geneva. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf

[49] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2010). Most-Favoured-Nation, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, New York and Geneva. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20101_en.pdf

[50] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2012). Transparency, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International investment agreements II, New York and Geneva.

[51] Available at: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/unctaddiaeia2011d6_en.pdf

[52] Yannaca-Small, Katia. (2008). "Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Recent Developments", in August Reinisch, ed., Standards of Investment Protection, oxford.

[53] Zamani, Ghasem and Rashedi, Mehryar. (2016). The Nature and the Scope of MFN Obligation under GATS, International Law Review, summer and Autumn, Volume 32, Issue 53. (In Persian)

[54] Ziegler, Andreas R.. (2008). " most-favoured-nation (MFN) treatment", in August Reinisch, ed., Standards of Investment Protection, oxford, Oxford University Press.

[55] Zeitler, Helge Elisabeth. (2010). "Full Protection and Security", in Stephan W. Schill, ed., International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford University press.

[56] Cases:

[57] ADF Group Inc. v. United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf

[58] Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc. and A.S. Baltoil v. The Republic of Estonia, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award, 25 June 2001, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/documents/Genin-Award.pdf

[59] American Manufacturing & Trading, In c. (AMT) (USA) v. Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93/1, 21 February 1997, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0028.pdf

[60] Biwater Gauff v. The Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf

[61] Compania de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v Argentine Republic II, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3, Award, 20 August 2007, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0215.pdf

[62] Emilio Agustin Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf

[63] Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Award, 22 May 2007, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0293.pdf

[64] Eureko B.V. v. Republic of Poland, Partial Award. 19 Aug 2005.

[65] Available at: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0308_0.pdf

[66] Fedax N.V. v. The Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 Jul 1997. Available at: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0315_0.pdf

[67] Gami Investments, Inc. v. The Government of the United Mexican States, UNCITRAL, Final Award. 15 Nov 2004.Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0353_0.pdf

[68] Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1, Award, 16 December 2002. Available at: www.italaw.com/documents/feldman_mexico-award-english.pdf

[69] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. The Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, Award, 31 March 2010.

[70] Available at: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0504.pdf

[71] Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 3 August 2005, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf

[72] Mondev International Ltd. v. United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2, 11 Oct. 2002. Available at: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1076.pdf

[73] Noble Ventures, Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11, Award, 12 Sep. 2005. Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0565.pdf

[74] Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Ecuador, UNCITRAL, Award, 1 July 2004, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf

[75] Phoenix Action, Ltd. V Czech Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/5, Award, 15 Apr. 2009, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0668.pdf

[76] PSEG Global Inc. v. Republic of Turk., ICSID Case No. ARB/02/5, Award, 19 Jan. 2007. Available at: http://italaw.com/documents/PSEGGlobal-Turkey-Award.pdf

[77] Ronald S. Lauder v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Award, 3 September 2001.Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0451.pdf

[78] S.D. Myers Inc. v. Canada, UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000. Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf

[79] Saluka Investments BV (The Netherlands) v The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 17 March 2006. Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf

[80] Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf

[81] Sempra Energy International v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16, 28 Sep 2007. Available at: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0770.pdf

[82] Swisslion Doo Skopje v. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/16, Award, 6 July, 2012.Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1080.pdf

[83] Siemens A.G. v The Argentina Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award, 6 February 2007, Avaiable at: http://www.italaw.com/documents/Siemens-Argentina-Award.pdf

[84] Tecnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003.

[85] Available at: http://www.italaw.com/documents/Tecnicas_001.pdf

[86] Ulysseas, Inc v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, Final Award of 12 June 2012, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1019.pdf

[87] United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award, 24 May 2007, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0885.pdf

[88] Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States ("Number 2"). ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004. Available at: http://www.italaw.com/documents/laudo_ingles.pdf

[89] Wena Hotels Limited v Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000, Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0902.pdf

Conventions and Other Documents:

[90] Agreement on Promotion and Protection of Investment in ASEAN, Available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/trtdocs/en/asean01/trt_asean01.pdf

[91] Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA). 1985, Available at: https://www.miga.org/Documents/MIGAConventionFebruary2016.pdf

[92] Draft articles on most-favoured-nation clauses (ILC Draft). in Yearbook of the international Law Commission, 1978, Vol. II, part two.Available at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_1978_v2_p2.pdf

[93] Energy Charter Treaty, Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/documents/itre/dv/energy_charter_/energy_charter_en.pdf

[94] Free Trade Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Chile, 2003, Available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/trtdocs/en/cl-us/trt_cl_us.pdf

[95] North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Available at: https://idatd.cepal.org/Normativas/TLCAN/Ingles/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement-NAFTA.pdf

[96] Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its sixty-seventh session (Official Records of the General Assembly, seventieth session, Supplement No. 10 (A/70/10).2015, available at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/sessions/67/a_70_10_advance_unedited.pdf