Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal

Third party financial support approach in international investment arbitration

Document Type : Scientific research

Authors

Seyed Sadegh Ebrahimi 1
Peyman Bolori 2
Mohammad Ali Solhchi 3
Mohammad Bagher Ghorbanvand 4

1 PhD student in General International Law, Zanjan Branch

2 Assistant Professor, International Law, of Islamic Azad University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Public International Law, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran

4 Associate Professor of Law, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch

https://doi.org/10.22067/economlaw.2022.74113.1119
Abstract
Arbitration for international investment comes at a high cost to both the investor and the government in question. One of the new phenomena in international investment arbitration is the financing of litigation by a third party investor. This investor is not interested in the issue of arbitration, but enters it with the hope that it will be profitable from resolving the dispute. International arbitrators have, in principle, no jurisdiction to review a third-party investment agreement because their jurisdiction is limited to litigation between the foreign investor and the host government. The investment agreement, therefore, has nothing to do with the legal relationship between the foreign investor and the host government. It will also point out that the existence of an investment agreement is subject to transparency rules to ensure that the principle of equality is respected, and that a third-party investment investor is an investor in financial claims and claims that acts before a court or arbitral tribunal. With the participation of a third party investment investor, the plaintiff (claimant) may use the necessary resources and intervene in the litigation or arbitration. Instead, the third-party investor is promised a portion of the profits if the lawsuit is successful. If the lawsuit is unsuccessful, the third-party investment investor will bear the costs of participating in the lawsuit or arbitration instead of the plaintiff.

Keywords

"Investment Arbitration"
"Third Party Financing"
"International Arbitration

©2022 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

  •  

    • Aren Goldsmith & Lorenzo Melchionda, The ICC's Guidance Note on Disclosure and Third - Party Funding: A Step in the Right Direction (2016), http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com (2016) the-iccs-guidance-note-on-disclosure-and third- party-funding-a-step-in-the-right–direction.
    • Biloune & Marine Drive Complex Ltd. Ghana Inv.  Center & Gov't of Ghana, UNCITRAL Arbitration Proceeding, Award of Damages and Costs (1990), pp.  211- 223.
    • Brabandere & Lepeltak, supra note 76, (2012). p 379.
    • CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO - FREE KIDS, INTERNATIONAL: http: // global tobaccofreekids.org/en/about_us/trade_litigation_fund/; Sabrina Tavernise, New Global Fund to Help Countries Defend Smoking Laws, N.Y. TIMES (2015).
    • Campbell McLachlan, Laurence Shore and Matthew Weiniger, International Investment Arbitration - Substantive Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2007).
    • Eric De Brabandere & Julia Lepeltak, Third - Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration. (2012). P 379- 382
    • EU Vietnam FTA, Ch. 8. Ch. 11. V. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB / 12/6, Procedural Order No. 3 (2015) .pp 2, 11.
    • Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam [hereinafter EU - Vietnam FTA], Ch. 8, Ch.  11 (2016).
    • Honlet, supra note 44, (2015) p 708.
    • IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest, 13-4 (General Standard 6 (b), commentary (b)), 15-6 (General Standard 7 (a), commentary (a)).
    • ICC Commission on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Commission Report: Decisions on Costs in International Arbitration (2015). https://iccwbo.org/publication/decisions-on-costs-in-international-arbitration-icc arbitration-and- adr -commission -report /.
    • International bar Association, Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, (2014). Pp5-14
    • International Court of Arbitration, Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the Conduct of Arbitration Under the ICC Rules of Arbitration 24 (Mar. 1, 2017), https: //cdn.icewbo .org / content / uploads / sites / 3 / 2017/03 / ICC - Note - to - Parties - and - Arbitral - Tribunals - on the - Conduct - of - Arbitration.pdf
    • H. McLaughlin, 'Litigation Funding: Charting a Legal and Ethical Course', 31 Vt. L.Rev. (2007).
    • Jean - Christophe Honlet, Recent decisions on third - party funding in investment arbitration, (2015).p30.
    • John Y. Gotanda, 'Awarding Costs and Attorneys’ Fees in International Commercial Arbitrations', 21 Michigan Journal of International Law (1999).
    • Jonas von Goeler, case X v. Y and Z (2012), p126, 2 LE CAHIERS DE L'ARBITRAGE (2013).pp 399 -416
    • Katia Yannaca-Small, Arbitration under international investment agreements: a guide to the key issues, New York: Oxford University Press (2010).
    • Kilim Inset Inhalant Hirakata Sanai ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v Turkmenistan, 1CSID Case No. ARB / 10/1, (2013).
    • Michael R. Bloomberg and Matthew L. Myers, http: //www.tobaccofreekids.org/press releases / post / 2016_07_08_uruguay. (2016)
    • Muhammad Cap & Sehil Inşaat Industry and Trade Ltd. V. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No.  ARB / 12/6, Decision on Respondent's Objection to Jurisdiction under Article VII (2) of the Turkey Turkmenistan Bilateral Investment Treaty, 50 (2014) (quoting Procedural Order No. 2, (2015). p 10.
    • Muhammet Çap & Sehil Inşaat Industustri ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti. V. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB / 12/6, (2015).P2.
    • Oxus Gold; Republic of Uzbekistan, UNCITRAL Arbitration Proceeding, Final Award (2015).
    • Philip Morris Brands Sàrl et al. V. Oriental Republic of Uruguay.
    • Pricewaterhouse Coopers, International Arbitration damages research: Closing the gap between claimants and respondents (2015), https://www.pwc.com/sg/en
    • Quasar de Valores SICAV S.A. et al. Russian Federation, (2012).
    • Quasar de Valores SICAV SA.et al. V. The Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration No.24/2007, Award of (20July 2012).
    • ROGERS, James. CIETAC Hong Kong consults on draft guidelines on Third-Party Funding. KluwerArbitration [online]. © (2018) Kluwer Law International, a Wolters Kluwer Company, published 13 August (2016), [cit. 5. 5. 2018]. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/08/13/cietac-hong-kong-consultson-draftguidelinesonthirdpartyfunding/?_ga=2.194759534.2%E2%80%A6
    • Rupert Jackson, Review of Civil Litigation Costs - Preliminary Report, London: (2009).
    • S & T Oil Equipment & Machinery, Ltd. Et et al. Juridica Inv.  Ltd.  et al.  , (2012) p 481.
    • South Am. Silver Ltd. Plurinational of Bolivia, PCA Case No.  (2013) Claimant's Opposition to Bolivia's Request for Cautio Judicatum Solvi and Disclosure of Information. (2015). pp 38- 40
    • Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, European Commission proposed draft, ch. 11, pp 1- 8 (2015).
    • VON GOELER, JONAS; THIRD - PARTY FUNDING IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON PROCEDURE, (2016), p127.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 11 December 2021
  • Revise Date 26 May 2022
  • Accept Date 19 June 2022

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Contact Us