]1[Abdollahi,M, Moarefi,S. (2010). Common but differentiated responsibility principle in International environmental law. Public Law Research,12(29.1), 199-224. (in Persian).
]2 [Amini,A, Mianabadi, H, Daryadel, E, (2019), Nature and Key Legal Issues of Paris Agreement on Climate Change, law research magazine (sbu), Tehran, (in Persian).
]3 [Bacchus, J. (2021). Legal issues with the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. CATO Briefing Paper, 125, 3-6.
]4 [Brandi, C. (2021). Priorities for a Development-Friendly EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Briefing Paper 20/2021, Deutsches Institut für
Entwicklungspolitik/German Development Instiute. DOI: https://doi. org/10.23661/bp20.
]5 [Brenton, Paul; Chemutai, Vicky. The Trade and Climate Change Nexus: The Urgency and Opportunities for Developing Countries (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
]8 [Cho, B. K., Jung, H., Chung, J. B., & Song, C. K. (2024). Implications of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on South Korean industries: Challenges and policy recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444, 141278.
]9 [Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2493 of 23 September 2024 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 as regards updating the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
]10 [Communication from the (EU) Commission ‘Fit for 55’: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality, 2021.
]11 [Corvino, F. (2023). The Compound Injustice of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Ethics, Policy & Environment, 1-20.
]12 [Das, K., & Bandyopadhyay, K. R. (2025). Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on steel decarbonization in India: a multi-stakeholder perspective on ambition vs. equity. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1-35.
]13 [ Dobson, N. L. (2020). Competing climate change responses: Reflections on EU unilateral regulation of international transport emissions in light of multilateral developments. Netherlands International Law Review, 67(2), 183-210.
]14 [Eicke, L., Weko, S., Apergi, M., & Marian, A. (2021). Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102240.
]15 [European Commission, Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism COM/2021/564 final (2021), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/956/oj/eng
]16 [Freestone, David, and Charlotte Streck (eds), Legal Aspects of Carbon Trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen, and beyond (Oxford, 2009; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Feb. 2010).
]17 [Gailhofer, P., & Graichen, V. Monitoring, Reporting and Verification in a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.
]18 [General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), WTO | Services - CBT - Basic Purpose and Concepts - Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment - Page 1.
]19 [Guidance Document On Cbam Implementation For Installation Operators Outside The Eu. (2023).
]20 [Gupta, A., Pandey, R., & Sapatnekar, S. (2024). Potential implications of the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
]21 [Grácová, K. (2024). UNION CARBON BORDER ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM (Doctoral dissertation, Central European University).
]22 [Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Hogan, M., & Kim, J. (2022). EU carbon border adjustment mechanism faces many challenges. Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, 22-14.
]23 [International Movement ATD Fourth World. Policy Brief and Proposals: Common but DifferentiatedResponsibilities.2011.url: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/getWSDoc.php?id=4086
]24 [Jousseaume, M., Menner, M., & Reichert, G. (2021). CBAM: Damaging to Climate Protection and EU Export Industries. Cep-Study.
]25 [Kardish, C., & Wildgrube, T. (2022). Carbon border adjustment mechanism. Administrative structure and implementation challenges. Interim report (No. UBA-FB--000825/ENG). Umweltbundesamt (UBA).
]26 [Leal-Arcas, R., Faktaufon, M., & Kyprianou, A. (2022). A legal exploration of the European Union’s carbon border adjustment mechanism. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 31(4).
]27[ Leonelli, G. C. (2022). Exporting the EU Climate Regime: The CBAM, Extraterritoriality, and the ‘Brussels Effect’. European Journal of International Law.
[28] Leal-Arcas, R. (2012). Unilateral trade-related climate change measures. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 13(6), 875-927.
[29 [ Otto, S. (2025). The external impact of EU climate policy: political responses to the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1-18.
]30 [Park, C. Y., Yamamoto, Y., & Doong, M. A. L. (2023). European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Economic Impact and Implications for Asia.
]31 [Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2022). Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries. Energy Policy, 170, 113245.
[32 [Piri, M; Maleki, R (2025). The European Union Carbon Border Adjestment Mechanism and its Implications for Iran. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 55 (2), 985-1004. (in Persian).
]33 [Research Center of Iran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture, (2023). Climate change and the future of global trade. (in Persian).
]34[ Simola, H. (2021). CBAM! –Assessing potential costs of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism for emerging economies.
]35[ Scott, J. (2014). Extraterritoriality and Territorial Extension in EU Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 62(1), 87-126
[36 [Shiravi, A., (2010), emission trading, law research magazine (sbu), Tehran, (in Persian).
]37 [Smith, D. (2022). The Legality of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the Limitations of World Trade Organization Rules on Effective Climate Action.
]38 [Smith, I. D., Overland, I., & Szulecki, K. (2024). The EU's CBAM and its ‘significant others’: Three perspectives on the Political Fallout from Europe's unilateral climate policy initiative. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(2), 603-618.
]39 [UNCTAD, A European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Implications for developing countries.
]40 [Venzke, I., & Vidigal, G. (2022). Are Unilateral Trade Measures in the Climate Crisis the End of Differentiated Responsibilities? The Case of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2020: Global Solidarity and Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (pp. 187-225). The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
]41 [WBG, The Trade and Climate Change Nexus
]42 [World Bank Group. Relative CBAM Exposure Index. 2023. url: https://www.worldbank.org/ en /data/interactive/2023/06/15/relative-cbam-exposure-index#3.
]43 [WTO, United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products – Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Malaysia (21 November 2001) WT/DS58/AB/RW, (‘US – Shrimp (21.5 Malaysia)’), /https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/58abr.pdf
]44 [12 [WTO, Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres – Report of the Appellate Body (17 December 2007) WT/DS332/AB/R (Brazil–Retreaded Tyres)
/https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/332abr_e.pdf
]45 [ Załucki, K. (2015). Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in International Law. International Community Law Review, 17(4-5), 403-412.
]46 [Петрова, Т. П. (2023). EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Legal Challenges and Relevance in Light of the Current Sanctions Regime. Журнал ВШЭ по международному праву (HSE University Journal of International Law), 1(1), 67-76.
