1. Akbarian, R. (2002). The World Trade Organization and Its Implications for the Iranian Economy. Journal of Economic Research, 2(4), 165-
199. (In Persian)
2. Ahouri, M. , Hashemi, M. and Ranjbar, M. (2023). Freedom from the perspective of liberalism and Marxism: With emphasis on votes Berlin
and Marx. Public Law Researsh, 24(77), 109-140. (In Persian)
3. Allison, J. R.; Hunter, S. D. (2006). On the Feasibility of Improving Patent Quality One Technology at a Time: The Case of Business Methods.
Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 21(2), 729-794. Available at: https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1120555/files/fulltext.pdf
4. Beckerman-Rodau, A. (2011). The Problem with Intellectual Property Rights: Subject Matter Expansion. Yale Journal of Law & Technology,
13(1), 37-89.
5. Bentham, J. (1839). A Manual of Political Economy, New York: G.P. Putnam. Available at: manualpoliticaleconomy.pdf
6. Brean, D. H.; Snow, N. (2020). Patent Law: Fundamentals of Doctrine and Policy. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.
7. Buccafusco, C.; Lemley, M. A. (2017). Functionality Screens. Virginia Law Review, 103(7), 1293-1377. Available at: BuccafuscoLemley_Online.pdf
8. Buccafusco, C.; Lemley, M. A.; Masur, J. S. (2018). Intelligent Design. Duke Law Journal, 68(1), 75-139. Available at: Intelligent Design
9. Bugbee. B. (1967). Genesis of American Patent and Copyright Law. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press.
10. Burk, D. L.; Lemley, M. A. (2003). Policy Levers in Patent Law. Virginia Law Review, 89(7), 1575-1696. Available at: ssrn_id2668828_code41670.pdf
11. Christie, A. F.; Rotstein, F. (2007). Duration of Patent Protection: Does One Size Fit All?. University of Melbourne Legal Studies Research
Paper, No. 245, 1-23. Available at: Microsoft Word - Coversheet Template.doc
12. Dam, K. W. (1993). The Economic Underpinnings of Patent Law. Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics, No. 19, 1- 30. Available at: The
Economic Underpinnings of Patent Law
13. Drahos, P. (1996). A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. )Translated By: Hekmatnia, M.; Moalla, M.; Taqikhani, A.( Tehran: Isl amic Research
Institute for Culture and Thoght (IICT). (In Persian)
14. Eisenberg, R. S. (1989). Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use. University of Chicago Law Review, 56(3),
1017-1086. Available at: Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use
15. Fagundes, D.; Masur, J. (2012). Costly Intellectual Property. Vanderbilt Law Review, 65(3), 677- 734. Available at: Costly Intellectual Property
16. Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal, 286 U.S. 123 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1932). Available at: Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal | 286 U.S. 123 (1932) | Justia U.S. Supreme
Court Center
17. Frakes, M. D.; Wasserman, M. F. (2019). Irrational Ignorance at the Patent Office. Vanderbilt Law Review, 72(3), 975-1030. Available at: Irrational
Ignorance at the Patent Office
18. Fromer. J. C.; Lemley. M. A. (2014). The Audience in Intellectual Property Infringement. Michigan Law Review, 112(7), 1251-1304. Available at:
The Audience in Intellectual Property Infringement
19. Fromer, J. C. (2016). Dynamic patent disclosure. Vanderbilt Law Review, 69(6), 1715-1738. Available at: Dynamic Patent Disclosure
20. Habibi, S. N. (2013). A Comparative Study Duration of Protection of Intellectual Works and Foundations. Published Master’s Thesis, The
University of Qom, Qom. (In Persian)
21. Hekmatnia, M. (2023). The Theoretical Foundations of Intellectual property. Tehran: Islamic Research Institute for Culture and Thoght
(IICT). (In Persian)
22. Husaini Suraki, M. (2005). The Meaning and Nature of Profit in the View of Utilitarians, Dialogues in Criticism and Reflection, 10(37), 301-320.
(In Persian). Available at: article_20509_e87696fdefea8b5c42348949a804a565.pdf
23. Jafarzadeh, M; Moradi, A. (2018). Abandonment and the it’s Effects on the Downfall of Patent right. The Journal of Studies in Islamic Law &
Jurisprudence, 10(18), 67-92. (In Persian)
24. Jaffe, A. B.; Lerner, J. (2006). Innovation and Its Discontents. Capitalism and Society, 1(3), 1-35. Available at: Innovation and Its Discontents
25. Khedmatgozar, M. (2012). Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian)
26. Kieff, F. S. (2003). The Case for Registering Patents and the Law and Economics of Present Patent-Obtaining Rules. Boston College Law
Review, 45(1), 55-123. Available at: The Case for Registering Patents and the Law and Economics of Present Patent-Obtaining Rules
27. Khorramtarigh, F. (2023). TPP Regulations in the field of intellectual property and its comparison with TRIPS regulations. Published Master’s
Thesis, Allameh Tabataba`i University, Tehran. (In Persian)
28. Landes, W. M.; Posner, R. A. (2003). The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University
Press. Available at: 3df34639fc7f0fd2fb5ef7f66a660ec7.pdf
29. Lemley, M. A. (2001). Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office. Northwestern University Law Review, 95(4), 1-34. Available at: Microsoft Word
- Rational_Ignorance.doc
30. Lester, S; Zhu, H. (2019). Rethinking the Length of Patent Terms. American University International Law Review, 1-13. Available at: ssrn_
id3389948_code344363.pdf
31. Lincoln, A. (1858). Lecture on Discoveries and Inventions. Available at: Abraham Lincoln’s Second Lecture on Discoveries and Inventions
32. Masur, J. S. (2010). Costly screens and patent examination. Journal of Legal Analysis. 2(2), 687-734. Available at: Costly Screens and Patent
Examination | Journal of Legal Analysis | Oxford Academic
33. Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1954) . Available at: Mazer v. Stein | 347 U.S. 201 (1954) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
34. Menell, P. S. (1999). Intellectual Property: General Theories. Available at: Intellectual Property: General Theories - CORE Reader
35. Menell, P. S; Lemley, M. A; Merges, R. P; Balganesh, S. (2023). Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age: 2023. Vol 1. Clause 8
Publishing.
36. Merges, R. P. (2022). American Patent Law: A Business and Economic History. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at:
F85982A5E5C502783814081E0BAE8D83.pdf
37. Mirhoseini, S. H. (2016). Encyclopedia of Intellectual Property Rights: Industrial Property Rights. Vol 1. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation. (In
Persian)
38. Mohseni, S; Qabuli Dorafshan, M. M. (2015). Literary and Artistic Rights (Comparative Study in Iranian, French and Egyptian Law). Mashhad:
Institute for Islamic Studies in Humanities. (In Persian)
39. Mulgan, T. (2007). Understanding Utilitarianism. Durham: Acumen Publishing. Available at: Understanding Utilitarianism
40. Nazari, A. (2012). Recognition of Positive and Negative Concepts of Freedom:. Political Quarterly, 42(1), 351-369(In Persian).
41. Olson, D. S. (2009).Taking the Utilitarian Basis for Patent Law Seriously: The Case for Restricting Patentable Subject Matter. Temple Law
Review, 82(1), 181-240. Available at: Microsoft Word - Original Cover page.doc
42. Rasekh, M; Ghasemi, M. (2020). The Concept of Rights: Views of Bentham and Khoei. The Quarterly Journal of Public Law Research, 22(68),
61-83. (In Persian). Available at: 1618053299-9902-68-3.pdf
43. Re zvanian, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Intellectual Property Law (AI in IPL). Published Master’s Thesis, The University of Qom, Qom.
(In Persian)
44. Sayedin, A; Karchani, M. (2024). The Industrial Property Protection Act within the Current Legal Framework. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation.
(In Persian)
45. Schwartz, H. F. (2006). Patent Law and Practice (5th ed). Washington, D.C.: The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
46. Seth, K. (2004). History and evolution of patent law – international & national perspectives. Available at: HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF
PATENTS – INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
47. Seymore, S. B. (2023). Patent forfeiture. Duke Law Journal, 72)5(, 1019-1078. Available at: Patent Forfeiture
48. Shavell, S. (2004). Foundations of economic analysis of law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Available at: Foundations of Economic
Analysis of Law.
49. Sheikhi, M. (2015). Principles of Intellectual Property Rights. Tehran: Mizan Leg al Foundation. (In Persian)
50. Subhaninia, M. (2010). Supplementing and Correcting Jerry Bentham’s Seven Standards Based on Islamic Doctrines, Journal of Ethical knowledge,
1(2), 29-44. (In Persian). Available at: 20130115082926-9708-9.pdf
51. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc, 334 U.S. 131 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1948). Available at: United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. | 334
U.S. 131 (1948) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
52. Varadarajan, D. (2022). Forfeiting IP. American Business Law Journal. 59(1), 175-226.
53. Vishnubhakat, S. (2015). Expired Patents. Catholic University Law Review, 64(2), 419-462. Available at: Expired Patents
54. Wiley, J. S. (1991). Copyright at the School of Patent. University of Chicago Law Review, 58(1), 119-185. Available at: Copyright at the School
of Patent
55. Yu, S. (2009). Political Privilege, Legal Right, or Public Policy Tool? A History of the Patent System. ATRIP Essay Competition. 1-40. Available
at: Microsoft Word - Sa Yu - A Patent History
